CLARIS
Clinical Case Review
DR

HCC_015

Patient Case ReportReview Required

Summary of the available patient information, imaging findings, and supporting medical references.

Evidence
4
Missing info
14
Conflicts
1

Research decision support for clinician review. This report does not replace clinical judgment.

Patient and study
§1
Patient IDHCC_015
HCC_015 CT preview
Findings
§2
Current imaging measurementsInsufficient
Lesion countNot computable
Largest lesion volumeNot computable
Approximate diameterNot computable
AFP (latest)3.6 ng/mL
Treatment contextTACE observed

No quantitative imaging measurements were produced from local inputs for this case.

Assessment
§3
Completed With Review Required.

No quantitative imaging measurements were produced from local inputs for this case.

Review the findings with the patient record, original imaging, and supporting medical references. See missing information and review flags below.

Timeline
§4
1998-11-01
study
Previous Imaging
1999-03-21
current
Current Imaging
Undated
followup
Clinical Observation
AFP
Undated
followup
Follow Up
Interval BL
Undated
followup
Follow Up
Interval FU
Undated
followup
Follow Up
TTP
Missing information (14)
§5
Document
  • Lab reportnot available in the current patient record
  • Radiology reportnot available in the current patient record
Imaging
  • current imaging measurementsNo local imaging input was provided for this study.
  • Comparison with previous imagingCurrent imaging measurements are unavailable.
  • Quantitative comparison with previous imagingCurrent imaging measurements are unavailable.
Laboratory
  • ALTnot available in the current patient record
  • ASTnot available in the current patient record
  • bilirubinnot available in the current patient record
  • albuminnot available in the current patient record
  • INRnot available in the current patient record
  • plateletsnot available in the current patient record
  • complete liver function panelnot available in the current patient record
  • AFP trendAFP trend cannot be calculated from a single source value.
Performance Status
  • ECOG performance statusnot available in the current patient record
Supporting medical references
§6
  • EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma (European Association for the Study of the Liver, 2018)Post-treatment interpretation needs follow-up imaging and clinical context.
  • AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, 2023)AFP should be interpreted alongside other clinical and imaging findings.
  • AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, 2023)Liver-function tests are needed for a fuller assessment.
  • ACR LI-RADS Treatment Response Assessment (American College of Radiology, 2024)Treatment response requires comparison with a compatible earlier study.
Review flags and conflicts
§7
  • Needs reviewA compatible previous study is unavailable for comparison, so treatment response cannot be assessed from the available measurements.
  • Needs reviewA compatible previous study is unavailable for comparison, so treatment response cannot be assessed from the available measurements.

For clinician review. Verify findings against the original patient record and imaging.